> > if there are industrial and residential buildings, they should not go into > the same landuse. >
This would make more sense then the current state of affairs as at least then I could use the data for _something_ other than highlighting a map, but alas that's not the case, > The landuse tag is mostly used for larger areas and not at parcel granularity; as described above, a single shop in a residential area might not always warrant an extra "commercial" landuse. So you can see a residential isn't always _exclusively_ residential. And likewise for industrial, attention to "most" > This tag should only be used for land which is primarily used for industrial purposes. It should not be used sweepingly for larger areas containing industrial infrastructure at different places but most of the area as a whole not being used industrially (rather be more detailed and add industrial landuse to these parts only). Just to be clear, I only bring this up because an automated method can be utilized to do all this work and it can tell you exactly how much "most" is. Or if you want to only allow it to create an area with 100% saturation of the same building type, that can also be done. But expecting humans to do this is rather silly. I still don't get the point though. At the point that we acknowledge that, 100% of landuse for "developed land" can be inferred/calculated from the aggregate buildings/ways it covers, the next question seems to be, * Should OSM do this? * Is this a function of a "map", or is it to ease app creation for consumers? The only use case we have know that was mentioned was to emphasize non-residential and de-emphacize residential. If so, it's only being used to style the map as it exists. If so, then if we can better calculate this with a nice PostGIS query (which I know we can do), the question is whether or not we should do it? -- In the event this email pertains to Real Estate, Texas law <https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=23&ch=531&rl=20> requires all license holders provide to prospective clients the following forms: Information About Brokerage Services <http://docs.evancarroll.com/realestate/iabs.pdf>, Consumer Protection Notice <https://www.trec.texas.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-forms/CN%201-2.pdf>. My TREC license number is 610570 <https://www.trec.texas.gov/apps/license-holder-search/?detail_id=881377951> and my sponsoring broker is NB Elite Realty LLC. -- Evan Carroll - m...@evancarroll.com System Lord of the Internets web: http://www.evancarroll.com ph: 281.901.0011 <+1-281-901-0011> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:51 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 12 Oct 2022, at 07:11, Evan Carroll <m...@evancarroll.com> wrote: > > > > Let's say you're in an industrial zone: do you tag as such > (landuse=industrial) if half of the buildings have been converted to lofts? > > > I would see landuse=residential on the parcels where people live and > landuse=industrial on parcels with industrial landuse. > > > > It would go both ways. But only if it's automated can we get an > indicator of the agreement between the macro-level landuse and the > buildings contained. > > > if there are industrial and residential buildings, they should not go into > the same landuse. > > Cheers Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- In the event this email pertains to Real Estate, Texas law <https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=23&ch=531&rl=20> requires all license holders provide to prospective clients the following forms: Information About Brokerage Services <http://docs.evancarroll.com/realestate/iabs.pdf>, Consumer Protection Notice <https://www.trec.texas.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-forms/CN%201-2.pdf>. My TREC license number is 610570 <https://www.trec.texas.gov/apps/license-holder-search/?detail_id=881377951> and my sponsoring broker is NB Elite Realty LLC. -- Evan Carroll - m...@evancarroll.com System Lord of the Internets web: http://www.evancarroll.com ph: 281.901.0011 <+1-281-901-0011>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
