Philipp Spitzer <phil...@spitzer.priv.at> wrote: > I like to propose > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Sled (which is > actually a quite old proposal) which tries to overcome the shortcomings > of piste:type=sled (without replacing it). > > I would be happy if you could provide thoughts/comments in the > corresponding wiki page (preferred) or here.
This seems to be somewhat similar to the recent discussion about using site-relations for camp-sites. Some people think that what I do in OpenCampingMap currently (using site relations) is an abuse of the "One feature, one OSM element" principle. (https://blog.geggus.net/2021/09/announcing-support-for-site-relations-in-opencampingmap/) Thus inventing another relation type for such loose bindings of distinct geographical features would make more sense than using a site relation. Let us call this relation, type=feature for now. A native english speaker will probably come up with a better name. The tagging would then be (In my case): type=feature feature=tourism:camp_site and in your case: type=feature feature=piste:type:sled The **feature** tag should then make clear that **only one element** tagged tourism=camp_site or piste:type=sled is valid in such a relation. This would then mark where all the distinct objects belong to. Would this be a viable path? Regards Sven -- Das Internet wird vor allem von Leuten genutzt, die sich Pornografie ansehen, während sie Bier trinken, es ist daher für Wahlen nicht geeignet (Jaroslaw Kaczynski) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
