Thanks for feedback! Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com>:
> Le 17.12.22 à 21:58, Illia Marchenko a écrit : > > Gender proposal is ready for voting. After the previous vote, this > > proposal has been reworked. I plan to start voting in a few days. > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Gender > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Gender > > > > Isn't it good practice to have an RFC after the last change > (i.e. today) ? > RFC isn't voting. Always pushing to go faster only leads to no votes and starting over- > in skimming the proposal, i didn't understand how redefining the meaning > of 3 tags will remove the ambiguity of one of the (unisex=yes) > This proposal isn't limited to clarification of the unisex=yes. Don't expect all contributors to read the counter-intuitive explanations > you offer. > a =segrated =not-segrated value would be much more intuitive > I added female=separate and male=separate to the proposal.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
