On 23/2/23 11:29, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Actually thinking about this in the context of the scenario at
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1435081431
I think we need a tagging solution to indicate that bicycle/foot may
bypass the gate rather than having to travel through the gate. Because
while in this situation there is a bypass available, other situations
there may not be, and some gates may not be so simple to climb
under/over.
Using another highway=path to go around the gate feels wrong as there
is really just one highway=track here, there is no separate path
running alongside it, so mapping it with one feels like mapping for
the router. My thoughts:
The locked National Park swing gates I come across all have a bypass
using bollards (at least most of them use bollards, some have natural
features that perform the same task). So for these a short path with
foot=yes, bicycle=yes should free up the navigation for these. I have
not bothered to map them as I take the view that the road is tagged
access=private, foot=yes, bicycle=yes. I don't recall if I have tagged
locked on the se gates. In any case I don't use routing for them - they
are my local area.
If you must climb over or go under a barrier then I think you are
subverting the purpose of the barrier.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
