On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:50:21 -0500, Kevin Broderick <k...@kevinbroderick.com> wrote: > It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a > BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to > mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill boxes where 1/3 of the > latter are missing the grills.
I think in such vandalized case it would be better tagged as disused:amenity=bbq or abandoned:amenity=bbq (in much the same way as amenity=drinking_water which has been broken/vandalized and no longer provides drinking water would be disused:amenity=drinking_water instead of amenity=drinking_water + drinking_water=no) -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
