@Antonio I realize the two destination tags are correct as I stated in my post. It's the ref=49 tags on the exit ramps that I object to. Those ways do not have any sign indicating a ref and are not typically tagged with a ref in my experience. Nor are there any ref tags on any exit ramps in the other interchanges I looked at.
@Paul Johnson - thanks, that is my conclusion as well. On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 12:44 PM Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 11:00 AM Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> The original mapper tagged the exit ramps, i.e., the ways >> immediately after the exit node (correctly tagged with ref=49, >> highway=motorway_junction) with: >> destination:ref=NY 78 >> destination=Depew;Lockport >> highway=motorway_link >> junction:ref=49 >> lanes=1 >> maxspeed:advisory=40 mph >> oneway=yes >> ref=49 >> surface=asphalt >> > > Yeah, I'd remove the ref=49 on that, since that's already correctly > reflected in the junction:ref=49 tag and the whole "using ref=* on ways to > make up for route relations not existing yet" thing's a decade past its > prime anyway... > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog: http://dswarthout.blogspot.com Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/184600884@N06
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
