I'll get on it today.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-taglibs/string/examples/web string.jsp


> Ah, my poor wording.
>
> String taglib's intended to deal just with generic bits of string
> manipulation. So just things like capitalise, find double metaphone, and
> count number of characters.
>
> Most of the taglibs in the Jakarta taglib project seem to be server side,
> so I'm not sure what the view is towards javascript/jsp taglibs. Utility's
> validate tag seems to be the only one to use javascript.
>
> I'm not sure if that's an intentional plan or just a natural reflection on
> most jakarta work being server-side.
>
> That said, it sounds like a nice idea. Being able to access a URL with an
> example of the taglib at work and maybe a simple explanation of how a JSP
> developer would use it might be a good next step?
>
> If that's possible with your company, I'd suggest you send an email with:
> [PROPOSAL] Preferences taglib
>
> or some such, as the subject. With a simple explanation and a url to an
> example. That way you can see if anyone gets enthused etc :)
>
> Bay
>
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Bob Lee wrote:
>
> > Very generic, and completely string based; very elegeant. I have to get
the
> > OK from my work first. They let you do DHTML-based tabbed forms (kind of
> > like you see in preferences dialogs). You can also use it to create
wizards
> > (multi-page forms with "next" and "previous" buttons) really easily.
They
> > work in IE and even Netscape 4+ (incliding 6 ;)). I'm toying with the
idea
> > of making them compatible with older browsers (the page would refresh
> > instead of dynamically swapping tabs), but it isn't one of my project's
> > current requirements.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-taglibs/string/examples/web string.jsp
> >
> >
> > > If they're generic, and string-based, then definitely.
> > >
> > > If not, then hopefully in another taglib.
> > >
> > > What kind of functionality do you have?
> > >
> > > Bay
> > >
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Bob Lee wrote:
> > >
> > > > Warning: Stupid question.
> > > >
> > > > I've been writing some pretty useful, reusable UI tags. I didn't
really
> > > > notice any in the TagLib. Is there room for these?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Bob
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:28 PM
> > > > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-taglibs/string/examples/web string.jsp
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > bayard      01/09/05 21:28:21
> > > > >
> > > > >   Modified:    string/examples/web string.jsp
> > > > >   Log:
> > > > >   Changed taglib uri to have a -1.0 on the end.
> > > > >   This matches the value that is generated into the tld file upon
> > > > building.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Revision  Changes    Path
> > > > >   1.2       +1 -1
jakarta-taglibs/string/examples/web/string.jsp
> > > > >
> > > > >   Index: string.jsp
> > > > >
===================================================================
> > > > >   RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-taglibs/string/examples/web/string.jsp,v
> > > > >   retrieving revision 1.1
> > > > >   retrieving revision 1.2
> > > > >   diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> > > > >   --- string.jsp 2001/08/30 12:18:19 1.1
> > > > >   +++ string.jsp 2001/09/06 04:28:21 1.2
> > > > >   @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> > > > >    <h1>
> > > > >    Jakarta STRING Taglib Example</h1></center>
> > > > >    <br>
> > > > >   -<%@ taglib uri="http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/string";
> > prefix="str"
> > > > %>
> > > > >   +<%@ taglib uri="http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/string-1.0";
> > > > prefix="str" %>
> > > > >
> > > > >    <table border="1">
> > > > >
> > > >
<tr><th>Tag</th><th>Input</th><th>Expected</th><th>Actual</th></tr></td>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to