> If there are values in having a common base class, one thing you might
> consider is *two* base classes (one for non-body tags and one for body
> tags).  If you implement the base classes using the Tag and BodyTag
> interfaces, you can even have the base class for BodyTag inherit from the
> one for Tag.

This is actually how my current implementation stands. I was just trying to
over-simplify things I suppose. Thanks for the insight. I'm convinced. ; )

Thanks,
Bob

Reply via email to