> If there are values in having a common base class, one thing you might > consider is *two* base classes (one for non-body tags and one for body > tags). If you implement the base classes using the Tag and BodyTag > interfaces, you can even have the base class for BodyTag inherit from the > one for Tag. This is actually how my current implementation stands. I was just trying to over-simplify things I suppose. Thanks for the insight. I'm convinced. ; ) Thanks, Bob
- Tag Performance Bob Lee
- Re: Tag Performance Shawn Bayern
- Re: Tag Performance martin . cooper
- Re: Tag Performance Bob Lee
- Re: Tag Performance Craig R. McClanahan
- Bob Lee
