On 5/27/05, Stu Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've followed the threads on this, and it sounds like folks have > zeroed in on the issue and know how to make grammars compatible.
Yes, that issue is closed. A proposed solution is here: [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-dev&m=111509090628437&w=2 ] I think Steve had another one too. If you go here [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-dev ] and search using appropriate keywords, you should find the rest of the related posts. > Has anyone done the work yet of converting the grammars, or maybe > some of them? If there's more to be done, can we maybe divide up the > work and get these in place? Daniel has volunteered [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-dev&m=111514547816399&w=2 ] Do you want to co-ordinate with him (and anyone else who is interested)? I think he said he was on vacation next week, so please be patient. > I've just started using the voxeo community developer site, which is > a very slick way to test voicexml apps. But it looks like the > grammar compiler is nuance's, so I've run exactly into the symptoms > Steve Hodson first described. > > Rahul, you mentioned in an earlier post on these threads that you > didn't have access to nuance-based interpreters. You can get access > to one for free at http://community.voxeo.com (no affiliation with > me). It's brilliantly simple. To create an app you give the app a > logical name, and an http app entry point. For my case, I pointed it > to the public IP of my home development box, and setup port > forwarding (I'm behind NAT) to route to tomcat/websphere. You can > then use any SIP phone (I used http://www.sjlabs.com/sjp.html) to > test. It works really well, and should let you test any grammars > that get submitted. > > Anyway, in my mind this was the missing piece for a free development > environment. http://eclipse.org/vtp/ provides simple editors for > grammar and voicexml files, and RDCs make it so you don't really need > gui call flow builders. This is all very useful information. I started a brand new RDC tutorials page here: [ http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-taglibs/ReusableDialogComponents/Tutorials ] If you feel like contributing to the documentation (which is always much valued), please create a new wiki page linked from the tutorials page (maybe called "ToolingResources" or some such, and probably a direct child of the RDC wiki home, but thats all upto you ;-) > It'd be awfully nice if RDCs could work with nuance. As you say, > RDCs' grammars adhere to the spec, and the problem may be with > nuance. But it sounds like the grammars can be nuance-compatible and > spec compliant. This sounds like a key step for wider RDC adoption. They do :-) top of post [ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-dev&m=111535891004622&w=2 ] Let me know if you have questions, the mail archives don't help etc. And you're welcome to post anywhere on the wiki too. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
