Henri Yandell wrote:
I put together a Derby test bit for a different issue that I ended up
WONTFIXing. I could add this in so you can make a test for this issue?
If you think that'll work, sure. I haven't given the test too much thought
yet ;-). I should probably go back and make similar changes in
UpdateTagSupport. I know it already takes care of closing the
PreparedStatement, but there can still be some exception "hiding". I'm also
not sure why Throwable is being caught in those two tags...
Hen
On 1/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17388>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17388
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-29 11:04
-------
Just a quick note that I checked-in a fix last week (r499150):
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/taglibs/proper/standard/trunk/src/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/sql/QueryTagSupport.java?view=diff&rev=499150&r1=499149&r2=499150
I guess I won't close this until it can be tested properly...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
--
Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D.O.Tech <http://www.dotech.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
