Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-taglibs Wiki" 
for change notification.

The following page has been changed by HenriYandell:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-taglibs/Standard_1%2e1%2e3

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  == Open issues ==
  
  === Caching enhancement ===
-  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17700 17700] - 
MessageFormat cache desired - no patch available. ACTION: Cache patch 
available, needs testing.
-  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32311 32311] - Need to 
cache Calendar.getInstance. ACTION: Cache patch available, needs testing.
-  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31789 31789] - Leak in 
ELEvaluator. ACTION: Cache patch available, needs testing.
+  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17700 17700] - 
Resources cache desired. I don't think it's a correct situation. ACTION: 
WONTFIX.
+  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32311 32311] - A 30% 
caching improvement can be achieved; I don't think it's good enough for the 
code change (and memory leak without a good cache). ACTION: WONTFIX.
+  * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31789 31789] - Leak in 
ELEvaluator. ACTION: WONTFIX. I don't think it will occur that often (shouldn't 
be that much different EL in a server, and it's low memory per EL). If more 
reports come in, we can work on them later or in a 1.2 implementation that can 
use a later JDK.
  
- The same cache enhancement should help all three of these. Testing with 32311 
shows a greater than 30% improvement when I go from no caching to forever 
caching. Not huge, not tiny. Still need to test with 17700 and 31789 examples.
+ 
  
  === Performance ===
   * [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27717 27717] - 
x:forEach slow. ACTION: Investigate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to