On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Brian Warner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jody Harris wrote: > > I asked a question about forking Twisted for the short term. There was > > no response to that. Either, "that's a good idea with obvious > > consequences.....," or "That's stupid because....." > > Eh, I think mostly it's just infeasible. It would take a lot of time and > work for a hypothetical fork to become as well tested, packaged, and > distributed as the mainline Twisted is, and then it would require a lot > of work to keep it from falling out-of-date. I believe it would be > faster to get the necessary patch accepted into mainline. > > The next step towards that is to write a unit test for the patch. > http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3462 is the place to submit such a > patch. > > Well, that certainly wreaks.... So, Tahoe-LAFS has broken usability pending a patch that another software team is reluctant to code a test for.... yippee.
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
