Hehe, yes, worry is a very human trait :-) But I can also imagine some slight practical use in having an up to date list. We plan to invite friends who are not so very computer savvy, and it would be good to see if their nodes are suddenly disconnected for some reason. If the list starts getting cluttered by legacy nodes I imagine it could be slightly less obvious which ones are a real problem.
But if there is no real reason for doing anything about it then I'll survive without a nifty mind soothing clean-up. Best regards, Anders 7 jun 2013 kl. 02:00 skrev "Zooko O'Whielacronx" <zoo...@gmail.com>: > It doesn't bother the Tahoe-LAFS clients to know about old servers > that are no longer connected. The main harm from it is it enlarges the > list of known servers and makes humans worry about whether the old > long-gone ones are causing some kind of trouble by still being in that > list. > > Regards, > > Zooko > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
