Kill Your TV: > Sorry for the delayed response. > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:17:48 +0000 (UTC) > Jacob Appelbaum <ja...@appelbaum.net> wrote: > > >> Any reason to not have these patches in Tahoe proper? > > I don't think so. AFAICT they're mostly waiting on unit tests to be > writen. >
Are there open bugs and a sketch of what each unit test would look like? > >> Also, why don't you use torsocks with an i2p configuration file? I'd >> take a patch to torsocks that adds an i2p configuration file, if you >> want. I suspect everyone else would be fine with it. > > We don't have SOCKS tunnels configured by default. I'd like to get > torsocks working for us. (I'll look into that). > Any reason for that? Seems smart... > > >> What do you think about a grid that is all Tor hidden services and >> then also has some i2p eep sites as well? Is there a way to compose >> Tor and I2P? > > ATM I'm not sure of the best way to make that happen but that'd be very > useful. > > I probably would never use I2P unless I first used Tor - I would probably want to bootstrap via .onions, actually. >>> Whenever I test our installation script on PCs/VMs that don't have >>> I2P, the tahoe installation process doesn't successfully go out to >>> the internet. The installation looks the same as it does when one is >>> completely disconnected from the internet. >>> >>> >>> tl;dr: Your bootstrap script should fine. :) > >> Do you want to extend it so that it works for both of us? > > I've been meaning to extend it so that the files can be downloaded from > my Tor hosted mirror > (<http://lqvh3k6jxck6tw7w.onion/tahoe-lafs/install/>). > > I just pushed the script to github @ > https://github.com/kytvi2p/tahoe-i2p-install. Maybe some of it will be > of use. > > Perhaps submit a pull request to Leif's repo? Give it an option and both programs will exist as one? All the best, Jacob _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev