Hello Eugen,
2014-03-24 14:53 GMT+02:00 Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org>: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Oleksandr Drach wrote: > > Hello Eugen! > > > > Really strange question. > > Why do you need to put Tahoe on top of Ceph? Are such overheads > acceptable > > at all? > > I think about ceph as building high-performance high-availability > expandable storage from unreliable components on a (ultra)local, fast, > reliable network. > What are the advantages of using Ceph vs Tahoe? Tahoe itself also can be used for building the describes storage without below Ceph layer. > Tahoe would be a higher level service which can use above storage backend > over a number of WAN links. >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev