Paul, Thanks a lot for the information! The feature we are looking for is exact ticket #573.
Actually, if I have a team can build such an application mentioned in ticket #573, which is maintaining a server capability mapping and able to submit per upload server preference. Can Tahoe team do define the interface mentioned in #573? If Tahoe team has no bandwidth on this, we are willing to help out on this issue. Just looking for a good way to coordinate the effort. :-) Thanks a lot, -Shu On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Paul Rabahy <prab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently there is not, but this has been discussed and it appears that > there is a general agreement that enhancing storage node selection is a > good idea. > > Related tickets: > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/467 > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/573 > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1838 > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/2059 > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Shu Lin <lin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Tahoe team, >> >> From current implementation, it seems Tahoe picks up servers based on k, >> n and happiness parameters. I am wondering if Tahoe can provide an >> interface or framework to hook up a 3rd party server distribution >> algorithm, which might allow 3rd party to hook up some other determinate >> server distribute algorithms, such as server location or network bandwidth >> as preference? >> >> Thanks a lot, >> -Shu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tahoe-dev mailing list >> tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org >> https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev