Hello Adonay, I recommend visting #tahoe-lafs on Irc2P for I2P-related Tahoe-LAFS questions.
Don't forget: I2P isn't Tor, and the Sybil model is different. https://geti2p.net/en/docs/how/threat-model#sybil Also, even if 20 out of 30 Tahoe-LAFS-I2P nodes are compromised, it's then down to a matter of breaking the encryption (like what Natanael had implied). The difficulty of doing that is well-documented. ihave2p http://ihave2p.i2p On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:01:00PM +0000, tahoe-dev-requ...@tahoe-lafs.org wrote: > Send tahoe-dev mailing list submissions to > tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tahoe-dev-requ...@tahoe-lafs.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tahoe-dev-ow...@tahoe-lafs.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tahoe-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Sybil attack? (Adonay Sanz) > 2. Re: Sybil attack? (Natanael) > 3. Re: Sybil attack? (Adonay Sanz) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:41:25 +0100 > From: Adonay Sanz <adonay.s...@gmail.com> > To: tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > Subject: Sybil attack? > Message-ID: > <CAHhxunq5k3PMMSqyTv2kaULAZDW=dhsr9cdbxvbt6t9ez+z...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi, > I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack > protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution? > > Thanks for answer > > Cheers! > Adonay Sanz > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/9149cba4/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:14:27 +0100 > From: Natanael <natanae...@gmail.com> > To: Adonay Sanz <adonay.s...@gmail.com> > Cc: tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > Subject: Re: Sybil attack? > Message-ID: > <CAAt2M1-WH6T-Hx8C5sqpAxbE7F+=-3taqsu_7jj5-ucdiqd...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Den 16 feb 2015 11:42 skrev "Adonay Sanz" <adonay.s...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi, > > I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack > protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution? > > Tahoe-LAFS in the default configuration don't rely on unknown nodes, so > there Sybil isn't a problem. And because of in-built authentication of all > data, a Sybil attack could at most prevent access to the data (or just to > chosen parts of or versions of the data), a form of denial of service. > Can't fake the data. > > The I2P version could be affected (as it is configured to mimic Freenet). > Standard usage isn't. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/5f36144b/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:53:16 +0100 > From: Adonay Sanz <adonay.s...@gmail.com> > To: tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > Subject: Re: Sybil attack? > Message-ID: > <CAHhxunq4FFdzUhLyz5JZOMCpdFUYL=_k2pprxt3_qyxprox...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Natanael > Thanks for answering. Really I'm noob in this area. > > I wanted to use I2P version. So, it's no possible way present or future to > block it? It's a really threat? > Can you explainme better what it means "configured to mimic Freenet"? > > Thanks a lot > > > Adonay > > > 2015-02-16 12:14 GMT+01:00 Natanael <natanae...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Den 16 feb 2015 11:42 skrev "Adonay Sanz" <adonay.s...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hi, > > > I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack > > protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution? > > > > Tahoe-LAFS in the default configuration don't rely on unknown nodes, so > > there Sybil isn't a problem. And because of in-built authentication of all > > data, a Sybil attack could at most prevent access to the data (or just to > > chosen parts of or versions of the data), a form of denial of service. > > Can't fake the data. > > > > The I2P version could be affected (as it is configured to mimic Freenet). > > Standard usage isn't. > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/c9de0e97/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev > > > End of tahoe-dev Digest, Vol 95, Issue 9 > **************************************** _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
