a...@boum.org wrote (07 Aug 2012 18:29:37 GMT) :
>> From: intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org>
>> 
>> Can you please publish the commits and tag used to build the
>> WhisperBack 1.6~alpha1 .deb?

> I can do that, but I fail to see the interest to publish a changelog
> entry and a tag for a release that only lives in an unfinished
> feature branch.

Seriously, do I really have to explain why it makes sense to publish
a way to easily find the source of every published version number and
binary package?

> What is the interest you see?

I'll give only one: peer review. How will I compare the source of
1.6~alpha1 with the next ~alpha2 or 1.6 final or whatever, when $we
release it, if these tags don't exist? I do know it's Python, and I do
know about debdiff, but still, we use Git for a (few) reason(s).
_______________________________________________
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Reply via email to