On 02/10/12 15:14, anonym wrote: > 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: >> Hi, >> >> please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, >> push your pristine-tar branch. > > I followed the instructions in > contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't > modified (i.e. it's still at commit 0bc2057). How can I fix this? > >> Other than that, a 0.18 release was made from the usual branches in >> there, with stuff that is not be ready yet for merging into devel. >> One drawback is that it has apparently blocked an improved t-p-s (with >> bigger timeout) from entering Tails 0.13. I'd like to avoid this >> happening again. I think we now have two possibilities: >> >> A. the NM presets persistence is finished and merged in time >> => t-p-s 0.18 or greater is shipped into Tails 0.14, >> with a (possibly much) bigger timeout. Great. >> >> B. the NM presets persistence is not finished and merged in time >> => I'd rather not fork a branch off t-p-s 0.17 and prepare >> 0.17.1 from there (overkill), so I think we should go for >> a chroot_local-patches. >> >> So, I think I'll wait a few days (say, until next Thursday), and go >> with #B if #A has not happened yet. Thoughts, better ideas? > > I'm gonna try for #A now: > > todo/persistence_preset_-_NM_connections has been implemented in > feature/persistent_NM_connections. IMHO it's now in a good enough shape > to be shipped in Tails 0.14, but there are some issues (see todo page): > > * violation of Single Responsibility Principle: Adding a 'gconf' > persistence option would have to go into upstream live-boot, > and IMHO this is way too Tails-specific for such inclusion. An > alternative would be to put the code from commit 1d3cae2 in > tails-greeter into our custom live-persist script. Since > live-persist is the glue that fixes all the quirks we have with > live-boot's vanilla persistence, this seems like a perfect fit. > This is done in commits 77c3261 and 4db38e9. > > * "Connect automatically" checkbox gets unchecked on each boot: IMHO > this bug is good :). Hence we can ignore this for now and just > mention it as a known issue (commit 0f7f652). > > I also wrote the user documentation (commit 269b672).
Great! I fixed the language a bit with commit 4e08074.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
