The current official Debian position on security regarding unstable and stable:
"Q: How is security handled for unstable? "A: The short answer is: it's not. Unstable is a rapidly moving target and the security team does not have the resources needed to properly support it. If you want to have a secure (and stable) server you are strongly encouraged to stay with stable." http://www.debian.org/security/faq.en.html But my empirical observations are that this has not been true for several years now: Debian unstable has been promptly supported with security fixes. Is anybody aware of any research regarding the relative security of Debian unstable / testing / stable or similar Linux distributions? Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
