On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:57:46 +0000 (UTC) intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote:
> Kill Your TV wrote (21 Nov 2013 19:20:32 GMT) :
> >> * regarding commit c32cab5 ("I2P: Document ferm exceptions"): the
> >> HTML table seems a bit too much markup for me; how about just
> >> using a simple list? (not a blocker either, just nitpicking
> >> probably ;)
> >>
>
> > Heh..OK. I can change it to a list if that'd be preferred.
>
> Yes, please (but you can save it for a future iteration, let's get
> the rest ready to merge first).
OK
[..]
> > This change is more cosmetic than anything since that
> > block could be removed and nothing would be functionally different
> > for a Tails user. The goal of this stanza/section was to remove the
> > false.i2p outproxy from the I2PTunnel configuration to try to
> > prevent end-users that are familiar with I2P from being confused by
> > seeing a configured outproxy in the interface.
>
> OK, makes sense, thanks for clarifying. So, only the code comment
> needs an update, cool.
AFK stuff got in the way, hence the delay.
Anyhow...I think the issues have been addressed in my branch.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
