Found two issues that stopped it from working. It is currently building. I suspect it will succeed. Will update shortly.
https://git-tails.immerda.ch/davidiw/tails/log/?h=bugfix David On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Wolinsky <[email protected]>wrote: > No, I tweaked the text message that mentioned the download size from 300 > MB to 500 MB. > > I am going to use your branch to build. > > I'll respond shortly. > > Cheers, > David > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, intrigeri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> David Wolinsky wrote (23 Dec 2013 19:29:48 GMT) : >> > I've pushed a working patch into tails/davidiw/devel that fixes 6221 and >> > 6514. >> >> Thanks! >> >> However.. you might have missed my <[email protected]> email, >> where I asked Julien and you to test and review >> bugfix/6221-support-newer-vagrant, that does just the same + has some >> improvements on top. >> >> Note that bugfix/6221-support-newer-vagrant is based on our stable >> branch, which is preferred for bugfixes that we may want to merge into >> stable. It seems that your branch is forked off the devel branch. >> If it's better than the one I've proposed, please rebase your branch >> on stable first. >> >> Also, having a bit finer grained commits (e.g. at least one for each >> independent bugfix) is preferred to squashing all into a single commit >> as you did. >> >> So, what should we do? As far as the Git history and ancestors is >> concerned, my branch is quite better. But perhaps yours has some fixes >> that I haven't? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> intrigeri >> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc >> | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc >> _______________________________________________ >> tails-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
