intrigeri wrote (23 Dec 2013 09:15:53 GMT) : > Care to file a ticket, drop a tcp_timestamps.conf into > config/chroot_local-includes/etc/sysctl.d/, and test the > resulting ISO?
Anyone? > I'll come back to you and Jacob for the design doc phrasing, as I'm > still not convinced we can put statements as bold as "tracking the > clock down to the millisecond" in there, without thinking a bit about > how an attacker is affected by the network lag between the time a TCP > timestamp was created, and the time when they get to see the packet. > I mean, I'm weak at stats and all and you probably know better, but > learning that "some unknown time ago, the system clock was T with > a millisecond precision" does not really give me the current system > clock with a millisecond precision, does it? This still needs some input. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
