anonym wrote (18 Feb 2014 01:07:07 GMT) : > Something we Tails developers may want consider is to make torrc > writeable by the `debian-tor` user; if we do, then `SAVECONF` will work > and we can use Tor Launcher as is (w.r.t. configuration persistence). > Without putting too much thought into this I'm not even sure if that > would make anything worse than the current situation. After all, if the > `debian-tor` user is compromised, it can reconfigure Tor in whatever way > it want via the control port (or socket) instead of torrc. A simple > script could be left running that would compromise new Tor processes in > case it's restarted, so there's not even that benefit with this separation.
Agreed, this doesn't sound crazy. > [Sorry, what do you means with "PTs"?] Pluggable Transports Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
