Hi, On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:29:49 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > intrigeri: > > I have written a technical report of my UEFI research, early test > > results and conclusions: https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/UEFI/ > > Nice! > > > 1. Ship a 64-bit kernel (#5456) in 0.23. I'm committed to lead this > > to a conclusion. Assigned to the 0.23's RM (anonym) for review. > > This will be done, as far as I understood.
> > 2. Write documentation for UEFI boot (#6562). I have listed on the > > ticket what (I already know) must be done in this area. > > That's a non-trivial task, and I am not sure we want to tackle > > it (UEFI support is a goal for 2.0) now. But if we can come up with > > a small subset of these tasks that would be good enough to add > > *beta* UEFI support to 0.23, then I'd be very happy. sajolida, > > it would be great if you could have a quick look to evaluate this. > > I could do that in time for 0.23, but I could also have an extra day > of free time :) > How do you feel about that? > > 3. Workaround the syslinux menu display bugs (#6576) I have seen on > > various hardware. Some of these bugs (on Mac) are blocking boot > > entirely, some are merely inconveniences. > I tested an easy workaround that works fine: removing the background and adding a Title line to replace it. So perhaps we could ship beta UEFI support for the release following 0.23? Cheers _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
