anonym wrote (04 Mar 2014 20:38:48 GMT) : >> Also, I'd love to see the test suite updated accordingly, so that we >> can check that no too obvious regression has sneaked in.
> I'm afraid there won't be enough time to implement this before the 0.23 > freeze. :/ Fair enough => #6305 ("Write tests for Tor bridges") is now a child ticket of the newly created #6839 ("Tor bridges support: complete phase two"). >> I'm especially concerned about the time synchronization mechanism, and >> more generally the impact on everything we do post-network-up. > The Tor Launcher started by our NM hook will block time syncing (and all > other NM hooks) until it's closed, which it will only do by itself when > Tor has built a circuit. OK, good. Cheers! -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.