anonym wrote (04 Mar 2014 20:38:48 GMT) :
>> Also, I'd love to see the test suite updated accordingly, so that we
>> can check that no too obvious regression has sneaked in.

> I'm afraid there won't be enough time to implement this before the 0.23
> freeze. :/

Fair enough => #6305 ("Write tests for Tor bridges") is now a child
ticket of the newly created #6839 ("Tor bridges support: complete
phase two").

>> I'm especially concerned about the time synchronization mechanism, and
>> more generally the impact on everything we do post-network-up.

> The Tor Launcher started by our NM hook will block time syncing (and all
> other NM hooks) until it's closed, which it will only do by itself when
> Tor has built a circuit.

OK, good.

Cheers!
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
_______________________________________________
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.

Reply via email to