Hi, koloa...@mail.md wrote (25 Mar 2014 10:42:00 GMT) : > I saw that Tails decided to use KeePassX as the default manager > (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5745).
Yeah, a while ago. > May I ask why it was preferred over Figaro's Password Manager 2 and/or > KeePass2? > GNOME3 compatibility? Certain features? User interface usability? Judging from the comparison on the ticket, if I had to make this decision again, I would drop revelation (poor maintenance), Figaro and KeePass2 (low popcon, unclear how it works on GNOME3), which only leaves KeePassX. > Debian package for KeePassX looks awfully outdated (0.4.3 vs. current 2.0 > Alpha 5). The 2.0 branch is still in alpha state. We usually don't ship that kind of software before it matures a bit. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
