24/04/14 10:40, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (23 Apr 2014 16:58:24 GMT) : >> In other words, nothing serious. For an overview of other potential >> fixes that may end up in the next 0.2.4 Tor release, see: >> <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=!closed&keywords=~024-backport>. >> After a quick look, nothing stood out as important for Tails' use cases >> but I've nevertheless asked the Tor devs for a confirmation. If I'm >> correct, this backporting solution may be the best compromise for us. > > I agree: backporting *only* the patches Nick pointed you at seems to > be, by far, the best solution.
Since time is short I take this as the only confirmation I need to proceed with this. I'll try to have a .deb built today. Nick also proposed [1] that the planned-for-the-next-0.2.4 fixes to these bugs may also be of interest to us: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9386 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11438 However, I do not want us to jeopardize the 1.0 release by complicating this backporting effort any further at this late stage. [1] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2014-April/005564.html Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
