07/05/14 18:35, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (07 May 2014 16:00:14 GMT) : >> However, I don't think that's relevant as I was testing *DVD* boot from >> the image I built. > > Ah, OK. I've added this (very important) info to the test reports page. > >> This was what I though the known issue was about after I confirmed >> that DVD boot doesn't work with older VirtualBox versions, like the >> one in Wheezy. > > I guess it does (since it is part of our manual test suite), but just > to be 100% sure: does Tails 1.0 boot fine from DVD on Wheezy's > VirtualBox?
It does. > If yes, then we are most probably facing a regression in syslinux. For what it's worth, the ArchWiki page on Syslinux [1] says that UEFI boot is broken in VirtualBox, referencing upstream bug #21 [2]. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/syslinux [2] http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21 > I'm willing to look into this further at some point; so, I wouldn't > mind more detailed info than "doesn't boot at all". Thanks in advance! Sorry, what I meant was that the Linux kernel doesn't boot; the syslinux menu is shown, but once a boot option is picked we get a completely black screen, and the VirtualBox process starts churning at 100% CPU with no sign of progress. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
