On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:16:26 +0000
Jacob Appelbaum <ja...@appelbaum.net> wrote:

> This change may
> require some UI changes for enabling access to the local network. I
> suggest that such access is disabled by default.

I agree, this is the inverse of something I wrote to the list about a
while ago -- if the local network is mine, I want to make an exception
and not send things through tor, and "local" may not necessarily mean
"directly connected". My workaround for this is a little shell+awk
script that patches the firewall rules. If the change that you suggest
is imported it will break my script and I won't be able to manage my
network from my computer running tor!

To address this we need a marker in the firewall rules that says "local
policy goes here" and then I can find out what rule number that is and
insert local policy there.

Blindly accepting traffic by virtue of it being to an RFC1918 address
is silly though, especially when an important intended use of tails is
running in an untrusted and possibly hostile environment.

Best,
-w

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.

Reply via email to