Hi, First, thanks to everybody that worked on that i2p security issue.
> * if I2P folks or anyone are ready to put quite some energy into > implementing a good security design for I2P-in-Tails, say, in time > for Tails 1.2, then it would be sad to drop I2P entirely for Tails > 1.1.1. We could change things so that I2P is functional only if > some option is passed on the kernel command-line; most potential > deeper counter-measures would probably be too invasive for > a point-release, but perhaps a few baby-steps can be walked in > time for the freeze (August 12); > > * otherwise, then I think we should seriously consider applying your > patch that entirely removes I2P. > I agree with that proposal. Cheers _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
