-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 08/08/2014 01:25 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> I would assume, that documentation would say, that one of the two >> Tails user must bite the bullet and set up a Tor Hidden Service >> Murmur server. > > I'm curious: did anyone test this and confirmed that Mumble can > actually work this way? >
It can and should work. That is how we use Mumble on I2P, via forced TCP mode; one person sets up a Mumble server on a standard server tunnel, and other users connect their Mumble clients to it via standard client tunnels. >> Maybe I am missing something here. Would OnionCat improve >> usability and ease the process? > > I'm not sure. The idea (IIRC, was long ago) was to use it to make > things work, using UDP if needed. > >> Or does Mumble have a mode for serverless peer-to-peer >> connections? > > Last time I checked, it didn't have any such thing. Confirmed, it currently requires a server. str4d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT5ck4AAoJEIA97kkaNHPnGNIP/jpKM/zIKUigdp8SBq8zKYgI xq+j1WEV13h3qg2i9SKoO5HgTRSEurKfLpt+I3n2vJBz0EfnOD7EkFe8TnA5QQ01 z27YYcVOGLi0z8/lT2VDD9wNSo7gTk0gnsTABTIusiDxWNM5uxu2v5Pw2smAswIJ hXgwYHHEoXs1AA4O135nKvRfTlRvMP77JiJZcH62GzYc8ifqeopt9V3AynAdX/5x jZu3isH0dpCfbgUZAdRXII3J/ajMST65VePll4z1lu6A4V1PAtDA6/apmOIRDKRR b4K6qoskhDe2M1q5fyFPYnoGOiGGCGBMvIH49AH3rO/2Trc/0QnxzqlOJVK0/A79 +EM9570ZnZOfH43J5ZRE6zNzcIYvSTL2Vk6lEIarS44H5RYwzXY999DMa0wOboyg a6M2kDDSle2F6t9LW+DW3RINRbch0Q+BeQ6pl0wUoK4yHIgKhwxdNOJfCr35e4zB wHfMvbx5hTFQoz+KCR4d2wRNb/BJ7N5AoIAofGg4ZDsx6N5XGNaLfxSOjFuvCYc0 S1e5/KDCEyUQr9abmQJFZRG6Q5JT8oifEX5QEcg+sQhxaMQD+XKhROx2LnmCilQL g1+g+POXcoHooiYDTWhoOE4z6NGai2LwRB6x+zlDQXvmjm4pkk/fsjFjNtbabjnW 9MzPtKBUtO5rClzFUp7g =kuTq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
