Hi! On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:29:37 +0100 intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote: > sajolida wrote (18 Feb 2015 11:36:27 GMT) : > > I don't get that last sentence... Could you explain a bit more it maybe? > > Are you saying that starting Tor Monitor "automatically" or not makes a > > difference on the type of access (read-only or read-write) that we need > > to its control port? > > If I spotted the misunderstanding correctly (see the other email I've > just sent), and if I guess correctly, it could be that: when simply > reading from the control port, Tor Monitor gets notifications about > whatever streams and circuits Tor creates etc. But if Tor Monitor is > started after Tor has already opened streams and circuits, then it > needs to send a GETINFO (or whatever) command to get the list of > already existing circuits and streams. > > Alan, did I guess it right? > Exactly!
Cheers _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
