sajolida: [...] > BitingBird is working on improving the OpenPGP documentation (see #5316) > so paperkey could be mentioned there. If we feel like getting into more > details and writing a full page about it, then it should probably be > moved to "Advanced topics".
I don't think a dedicated page is needed. > > But before being able to decide on this we need to brainstorm on what > would be in that documentation. We usually limit ourselves to explaining > what the software does, pointing to upstream documentation, and > explaining the specificities of that software in Tails. > > In the case of paperkey, what is worth being mentioned? > > As a first remark, the manpage is not clear about the fact that the > backup of the "secret information" still includes the protecting by its > passphrase. Maybe that should be fixed upstream actually. > I can mention it. I'll just link to http://www.jabberwocky.com/software/paperkey/ that is short but complete. And yes, the upstream page does spedify the encrypted (or not) key, so I don't think we should re-write its doc. Cheers, BitingBird _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
