Hi, intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote: > > Of course, this only make sense if we get a compression rate that is > > worth doing all that stuff... so maybe we should investigate c) before > > deciding on this and seem how the result affects the final ISO size. > > Exactly. I bet a couple doc branch reviews that the test results will > tell us that mksquashfs is simply good enough. > In my opinion, all this was a nice attempt, but unfortunately these compression things doesn't seem me worth it given the energy involved vs the expected gain.
Cheers _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
