On Fri, 29 May 2015 15:19:43 +0000 (UTC) intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote:
> Perhaps we should call all our expected releases a.b.c, and "bonus" > intermediary releases a.b.c.d? In the case at hand, instead of 1.3, > 1.3.1 and 1.3.2, this would have given 1.3.0, 1.3.0.1, and 1.3.1. As long as Tails doesn't decide to switch to Firefox or Chrome versioning, I'm good. :) What you're suggesting is completely sensible. "Which version of Tails are you seeing that in?" "Tails 61.0.25223978297"
pgpBpVW4CYgqf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
