On 05/31/2015 09:24 AM, intrigeri wrote: > * we're not very clear what the first component means (1.0 had > a well-defined meaning, no idea what 2.0 will be; we're currently > using 2.0 and 3.0 on our roadmap to make mid/long-term perspectives > and goals more readable to everyone involved, but that doesn't > mean we'll indeed release ISOs labeled 2.0 and 3.0 when we reach > them; I know that's confusing, sorry)
I think it would be much nicer to leave the version numbers for actual releases, and use descriptive milestone names for larger visions that currently do not have a set Tails release, something like: * 2.0 => Tails_maintainability * 3.0 => Tails_hardening * 4.0 => Tails_jessie Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
