Hi, random_u...@airpost.net wrote (31 Jan 2016 20:11:50 GMT) : > What does seem quite clear to me, however (and has ever since I first > became aware of this matter) is that the best interests of at least an > overwhelming majority of Tor Browser and Tails users would best be > served by having the fingerprints of the Tor Browser in Tails and the > stand-alone Tor Browser be as indistinguishable from each other as > possible. After all, the reality is that the total number of Tor Browser > users (stand-alone as well as Tails) already comprise but a mere > fraction of total Internet users. Does it really make sense to splinter > such a small minority into even smaller sub-divisions? And to do so for > something as /relatively/ trivial and even petty as not being able to > reach a consensus over whether to include an ad-blocker (or which > ad-blocker to include)? Isn't this self-defeating behavior?
FYI: After a quite long and moderately pleasurable discussion on this topic, that happened over 2014-2015 on this very mailing-list (subject: "AdBlock Plus in Tails' Tor Browser"), we decided to keep AdBlock Plus. The point you're making here was taken into account. I doubt anyone involved in the previous discussion will fancy diving into it again. Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
