On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:36 PM, <maddonkeyk...@safe-mail.net> wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> > Apparently from: tails-dev-boun...@boum.org > To: The Tails public development discussion list <tails-dev@boum.org> > Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] dconf-editor dropped, gedit-plugins, > systemd,w32codecs > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:44:40 -0600 > >> TL;DR: I think we should ship as many codecs as we can, to allow as >> wide of access to media as possible. >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:38 AM, intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote: >> > Austin English wrote (07 Mar 2016 03:05:46 GMT) : >> >> That said, including win32 codecs is probably worthwhile. > > RE: win32 codecs - I agree. So let's say we have win32 codecs installed. Can > Totem handle these codecs, or do we need to install another video player?
It can, totem uses gstreamer. > Now regardless of video player, there are a few different browser plugins > available in the repos to directly handle these codecs. The problem is, you > probably don't want these to load into Tor Browser. > > So what could be used instead? The unsafe browser or a separate profile or > browser with the codecs and plugin capability? I think wma encoded videos embedded online are probably quite rare, and are a separate use case from supporting them with totem. -- -Austin _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
