The best thing is to think befor you, or somebody else, uses a routing App, Site, etc.
So when you view the route, you will see that a immidiate crossing would be shorter than the showen way.
I always thought deleting correct data in osm is kind of forbidden. So i would recommend to leave it in there, its not destroying anything or?
And something to think: should we start mapping every exception in StVO? It could be funny...
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>schrieb:
PS:
I wrote:
> But the data is NOT correct. There are only a few crossing opportunities
> tagged for every street, but it is legal here in Austria to cross a street
> not only on a zebra crossing, but also at ANY point that's not within 25
> meters of the next zebra crossing. This cannot be sensibly tagged with the
> "crossing = footway" mapping approach that the separate sidewalk mappers
> are using.
As an example:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Weyringergasse%2033,%20Wien
Here, there's a ~250-meter-long way without any mapped crossing. If, as a
hypothetical example, I want to go by foot from the Sri Lankan embassy to
the Restaurant Venezia right across the street, the router sends me on a
~250 meter detour all the way to Favoritenstraße and back instead of the ~25
meter segment along the abstracted street I would otherwise get.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
_______________________________________________ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
