Hi, It looks like the vote is in favour of relations and there is the beginnings of consensus around other tags.
So I have updated the wiki page at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ABS_Data#Australian_Bureau_of_Statistics At the moment the wiki says tagging will only go on relations - but thought and investigations are still needed on this:- * Does the ABS require attribution on the nodes and ways - these have been heavily butchered from the original shape files. Whereas the relations bare a reasonable semblence to the shape files they were sourced from * I have been thinking about future updates - I think it's going to be ugly to do anything other than diff the shape files from this import and the next. Again, because of the amount of mangling that has gone in to the import I don't think carrying the identifiers across to OSM makes much sense other than for the relations. Have a read and let me know thoughts/objections. Once we have the wiki page in reasonable shape I'll ask for feedback from the main osm list cheers -- Franc
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
