On 16/08/2009, at 12:17 PM, Liz wrote: >> While looking at the wiki page describing the highway tag[0] >> recently, >> I noticed that the Australian entry in "International Equivalence" >> doesn't match what is on the Australian Tagging Guidelines page, and >> what actually gets mapped. > > I used to get incredibly confused with primary = b and secondary = c > but this list got me better understanding the classification
I've fixed the MABC mappings on the Highway page to correspond to the Australian Tagging Guidelines and actual use (I didn't touch any of the other bits). Hopefully it doesn't get reverted in the fallout from the arguments on the main talk list. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
