Quoting myself <mrpul...@lizzy.com.au>: > Incidentally, I've noticed that the route numbers and route names > aren't showing in Mapnik for relations. As an experiment, I added a > stub for C528 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/374047 ) > using someone else's trace and my voice recording of the route number. > I placed highway=secondary into the relation rather than the way, and > the route number shows. Should we be doing this for all relations? > There wasn't a road name sign, so I don't know yet whether this will > help make names show up.
As an experiment, I tried this on Tawonga Gap Road. Previously to my last edit, the route number was in relation, highway=secondary and the road name was on the way. The name showed but not the route number. I moved both the road name and highway=secondary to the relation - now the route number and road name shows up. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/22737466 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/374114 The question is, should we move "highway=" onto the relation for all relations? There's probably a fix for Mapnik to save editing every relation we've done, so I've added a ticket to OSM. http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2599 Mark P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "They offered to transport me back to any point in history that I would care to go, and so I had them send me back to last Thursday night, so I could pay my phone bill on time." (Weird Al Yankovic, "Everything You Know Is Wrong") _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au