David Murn wrote:
All 1817 points were added to the database, although there were 9
pairs of points that shared the same location even though the address
details given were different, bad geocoding...
    

I must have missed it, but was permission granted by the content owners,
or is someone hoping to use OSM in a legal testcase?

David


  
Actually, the data on OSM is not the same as what is on the original database - different GPS coordinates, some spelling differences etc, which can be readily demonstrated. A test case probably wouldn't get very far.

Richard
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to