David Murn wrote: Actually, the data on OSM is not the same as what is on the original database - different GPS coordinates, some spelling differences etc, which can be readily demonstrated. A test case probably wouldn't get very far.All 1817 points were added to the database, although there were 9 pairs of points that shared the same location even though the address details given were different, bad geocoding...I must have missed it, but was permission granted by the content owners, or is someone hoping to use OSM in a legal testcase?David Richard |
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au