Steve Bennett wrote: > Have we reached the point where we start making inflammatory straw-man > arguments rather than working together to reach a sensible conclusion? > I hope not. I'll continue in good faith... > > Do you agree that a useful map is one that contains "enough" > information but not "too much"? The Lonvia map, at the zoom level I > pasted (ie, all of Victoria, and some of NSW and SA) would, under your > scheme, show a grand total of exactly two trails. Any view of NT, SA, > WA on Tasmania would show zero. QLD would show one. IMHO, this is too > little.
And I disagree. Having registered my disagreement, can we please leave it at that? John H _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
