On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Roy Wallace wrote: > Another possibility (that I much prefer) is that the available data > is used in the same was as, say, aerial imagery - i.e. not bulk > imported, but used directly and interactively by mappers. This is why > I think John is wrong to be "protective" of data that could be useful > - I see it as analogous to being "protective" of, say, aerial imagery. > The data isn't John's, so I wouldn't call it 'protective' but 'cautious'. IF the list discusses the ins and outs and decides for importing that is fine - but this time JS has decided to wait for the list to talk about it.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
