On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 11:55 +1000, John Smith wrote: > On 8 May 2010 07:29, John Henderson <snow...@gmx.com> wrote: > > The -1 layer tag accurately describes the situation when the "ford=yes" > > tag is actually and literally applicable. There may be no special > > construction of the roadway at a ford - just a warning to expect a wet > > crossing for a period after some decent rain. So I think the layer tag > > is OK. > > In my opinion, since the roadway isn't a tunnel under the waterway, > the layer tag should be the same as the waterway.
I dont think its a good idea for a waterway and highway to intersect on the same layer. You dont need a bridge/tunnel to use a layer tag, landuse comes to mind which isnt that far removed from a river area. Another thought, is how will a ford be rendered if it has a layer below a waterway with a higher/lower layer? I think layer tag should be used, but other than layer=-1, I cant think what else. David _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
