On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Ross Scanlon <i...@4x4falcon.com> wrote: > > Additionally just don't delete 300 or so nodes without seeing if it's by > general agreement rather than just announcing that you've done it. >
Ok sorry, in future I'll make announcements here. I just didn't want to spam the list and I knew it could be reverted anyway. > Personally I'd rather see the node left with name address and all the tags > and the area just marked with the appropriate type and source. > > eg for the "Campbell Primary School" the node has: > > amenity=school > name=Campbell Primary School > addr:city=Canberra > ... > source=gov.au > > and the area tagged as > amenity=school > source=whatever > > Then the names will not double render but the name is rendered in an > appropriate position. It's not really practical for suburb relations but > most have a place= node anyway. What if I just do the ones from NSW, where the tags on both the way and node are exactly the same, or only less major differences? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
