Are you sure this is the right changeset. It only shows one deleted node and one new node.
Cheer Ross > On 5 December 2010 17:43, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think that this >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6545161 should be >> reverted on the grounds that my source tags were deleted with no >> better replacement (along with other tags deleated). I don't like that >> this person has just deleted my hard work without even an explanation >> as to why it was deleted. The same user did this exact same thing >> before, and when I notified them about this and made the revert, they >> just reverted my revert. I don't want to start an edit war, so I am >> asking other mappers if you also think that this changeset was >> deconstructive. If you do then hopefully we won't have an edit war. >> >> Previously I asked this user directly about data that appeared very >> much like that from Google Maps, they said they may have copied >> directly from a Google Map, in our exchanges they said to me, "I find >> your tone condescending and offensive." Because of this I want to >> avoid sending a message to them again, so I would much rather conduct >> my communication in the public here. >> >> Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
