Here is a suggestion:
Whenever a situation like this comes up (i.e. posted signage which does
not fit neatly in a predetermined/official tag case), why not introduce
a new tag:
signposted: "Literal text from sign"
...on the basis such a thing cannot be questioned, because that is what
is there in reality. (Further hint: photograph to prove it?)
Which reminds me, I need a picture of one of the semi-local "Unlimited:
Drive to Conditions" signs. Second thoughts, scratch that it has already
been done: http://www.gobbie.net/stuff/DriveToSuitConditionsSmall.jpg
On 17/02/11 18:02, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
> Make a new specific tag ("unsuitable_for_caravans=yes;
> source:unsuitable_for_caravans=survey"), and document it on the wiki
> (with a photo of a sign). At least that's explicit and clear.
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:58 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
> <mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Saw a couple of roads signed "unsuitable for caravans" which seems
> like council butt covering but I'm not sure how to tag it since it's a
> sign to discourage rather than to disallow.
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
